Annie the Book reviewed The Bloodless Boy by Robert J. Lloyd
The Bloodless Boy, by Robert J. Lloyd
5 stars
Set more than 100 years before the founding of the Metropolitan Police and Scotland Yard, Robert J. Lloyd’s astonishingly gripping mystery, The Bloodless Boy, features two natural philosophers (scientists before we had the term scientist) investigating a fiendish series of murders in London. On a very cold January morning in 1678, Robert Hooke and his former assistant, Harry Hunt, are charged by Justice of the Peace Sir Edmund Berry Godfrey to find out who is responsible for the death of a boy. Why two natural philosophers? Well, the boy was found entirely drained of blood. Who better to find out what really happened than two people dedicated to Reason, in a city on the edge of anti-Catholic fervor and superstition? Both men have followed their intellectual curiosity wherever it might take them: meteorology, cryptography, medicine, chemistry, mathematics, physics, microscopy, geology, and more. To them, it’s all Natural Philosophy instead …
Set more than 100 years before the founding of the Metropolitan Police and Scotland Yard, Robert J. Lloyd’s astonishingly gripping mystery, The Bloodless Boy, features two natural philosophers (scientists before we had the term scientist) investigating a fiendish series of murders in London. On a very cold January morning in 1678, Robert Hooke and his former assistant, Harry Hunt, are charged by Justice of the Peace Sir Edmund Berry Godfrey to find out who is responsible for the death of a boy. Why two natural philosophers? Well, the boy was found entirely drained of blood. Who better to find out what really happened than two people dedicated to Reason, in a city on the edge of anti-Catholic fervor and superstition? Both men have followed their intellectual curiosity wherever it might take them: meteorology, cryptography, medicine, chemistry, mathematics, physics, microscopy, geology, and more. To them, it’s all Natural Philosophy instead of the narrow fields of later scientists. Which, I suppose, does make them good potential investigators, even if they’ve never actually dabbled in forensics...
Read the rest of my review at A Bookish Type.